The myth of perfection
With the release of the imaging software Adobe Photoshop in the 1990s, “Photoshopping” entered the English lexicon. Like Google, Photoshop seamlessly has integrated itself into the scientific enterprise. Scientists use the software to tweak images and to generate publication-quality figures. It’s just so easy to create a blemish-free image. But there are guidelines to what is and isn’t acceptable to do with the software. There are a few simple rules to remember.
First, ask yourself whether any changes are needed. The best-case scenario is to be able to present your original, unaltered data in the figure. However, journal editors realize that sometimes the best case isn’t possible — an overly dark H&E stain or an overly bright Coomassie stain of a gel are two examples.
Once you’ve decided it’s appropriate and necessary to make changes, make sure your adjustments are linear. Most journals, including the journals published by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, require that adjustments be made uniformly to every pixel in the entire image. That means using the brightness and contrast functions in Photoshop is acceptable within reason, since these functions apply a linear adjustment to each pixel in the image. Also, go easy on moving the slider (see the figure). Overadjusting the brightness or contrast can hide background features, which is a misrepresentation of your data. Nonlinear adjustments include adjusting the gamma settings or using the “Curves” function in Photoshop. These actions are discouraged, since they do not apply changes equally to the pixels in the image. If these adjustments are used, then you must disclose their use in the figure legend.

Speaking of data misrepresentation, specifically enhancing, removing or obscuring features would fall into this category. Worried that a faint band won’t support your conclusions? Bothered by the cell debris in the corner of your image? Concerned that the reviewers may say that the co-localization or the co-immunoprecipitation isn’t strong enough? The temptation to enhance or remove these features is real, but this type of manipulation falls into the misconduct category and could have serious consequences.
The final image should look like your original data, warts and all. You always should inspect your final figure and ask yourself if it is a true representation of the original capture or image. If your answer is no (or kind of), you should re-evaluate your figure.
Practically speaking, if any of these issues are discovered during the review of your paper or even after it is published, they could delay publication of your article, result in a correction, or even end in a retraction. More importantly, these issues go deeper and speak about the reproducibility of the work and your integrity as a scientist. Other researchers will not be able to replicate the results shown in your article if some of the data have been enhanced or hidden selectively. Presenting your data in a transparent manner ensures that you have done your due diligence.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition monthly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Science
Science highlights or most popular articles

CRISPR epigenome editor offers potential gene therapies
Scientists from the University of California, Berkeley, created a system to modify the methylation patterns in neurons. They presented their findings at ASBMB 2025.

Finding a symphony among complex molecules
MOSAIC scholar Stanna Dorn uses total synthesis to recreate rare bacterial natural products with potential therapeutic applications.

E-cigarettes drive irreversible lung damage via free radicals
E-cigarettes are often thought to be safer because they lack many of the carcinogens found in tobacco cigarettes. However, scientists recently found that exposure to e-cigarette vapor can cause severe, irreversible lung damage.

Using DNA barcodes to capture local biodiversity
Undergraduate at the University of California, Santa Barbara, leads citizen science initiative to engage the public in DNA barcoding to catalog local biodiversity, fostering community involvement in science.

Targeting Toxoplasma parasites and their protein accomplices
Researchers identify that a Toxoplasma gondii enzyme drives parasite's survival. Read more about this recent study from the Journal of Lipid Research.

Scavenger protein receptor aids the transport of lipoproteins
Scientists elucidated how two major splice variants of scavenger receptors affect cellular localization in endothelial cells. Read more about this recent study from the Journal of Lipid Research.