Science will suffer
“We are constantly told that we are bringing politics into science or creating identity politics. Our identity is not political; our identity is politicized. Who we are is a matter of debate because people want to debate our rights.” —Alfredo Carpineti, Pride in STEM
When the ASBMB Today staff started thinking about a feature article to anchor our first Pride Issue, we zeroed in on the recent crop of laws targeting LGBTQIA+ rights. We wondered if these laws were having an impact on the career decisions of our members. How were universities and other institutions responding to this flurry of legislation? If a scientist or a member of their family was in the targeted community, would they avoid working in states that had passed or were considering these laws?
It seemed straightforward. We have members all over the country — some in leadership positions at universities in affected states. I figured we could just have a writer call them up and get the scoop.
But people did not want to talk. Or if they did, they didn’t want to be named. I was told by a number of members — including straight, cis-gender scientists living and working in states unaffected by the new laws — that the subject was toxic or radioactive. These folks are afraid of losing their jobs.
The politicians who put those laws on the books have done more than restrict drag shows and penalize trans kids and their families. They have created a climate of fear, and even the most powerful faculty members in the bluest of states do not feel safe.
I’m so grateful to the people who went on the record. Standing up in this climate is risky. And we are less likely to speak up on issues we think don’t directly affect us or the people around us. Many in the LGBTQIA+ community choose to stay quiet about their identities, so it might be hard to tell if state politics are influencing the next move of someone in your lab.
Importantly, as talented researchers choose to settle in states where they feel safer, the divide between have and have-not universities will only widen. And science will suffer.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Who decides when a grad student graduates?
Ph.D. programs often don’t have a set timeline. Students continue with their research until their thesis is done, which is where variability comes into play.
Redefining ‘what’s possible’ at the annual meeting
The ASBMB Annual Meeting is “a high-impact event — a worthwhile investment for all who are dedicated to advancing the field of biochemistry and molecular biology and their careers.”
Molecular impressions of water as cuneiform cascade*
Inspired by "the most elegant depiction of H2O’s colligative features," Thomas Gorrell created a seven-tiered visual cascade of Sumerian characters beginning with the ancient sign for water.
Water rescues the enzyme
“Sometimes you must bend the rules to get what you want.” In the case of using water in the purification of calpain-2, it was worth the risk.
‘We’re thankful for our reviewers’
Meet some of the scientists who review manuscripts for the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Lipid Research and Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
Water takes center stage
Danielle Guarracino remembers the role water played at two moments in her life, one doing scary experiments and one facing a health scare.