Public affairs committee responds to NIH efforts to address sexual harassment in science
The following is a statement from Benjamin Corb, public affairs director for the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
National Institutes of Health Director Francis S. Collins released a statement yesterday making it clear that the agency does not tolerate sexual harassment. While the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’s Public Affairs Advisory Committee appreciates the sentiments expressed in the statement, NIH policy changes are needed to curb sexual harassment at grantee institutions.
Our primary concern is that Collins’ statement does not define how the NIH will respond to violations of sexual harassment policies at institutions where NIH-funded research is performed. The NIH and its grantee institutions must work together to ensure that the biomedical research enterprise promulgates a culture of safety and respect.
The science-funding agency also launched what it called an “anti-sexual harassment” website this week. The website emphasizes that grantee institutions should address sexual harassment internally, according to local, state and federal laws, and requires them to report to the NIH only when the status of senior/key personnel on projects changes.
While institutions that receive NIH funding have a critical role to play in stopping sexual harassment, we are concerned that this limited reporting requirement may perpetuate the underreporting of violations that lead to senior/key personnel changes and discourage institutions from addressing less severe forms of harassment that may precede more severe violations. Beyond reporting the removal or replacement of personnel, the agency also should document other administration actions by institutions and formulate its own responses when appropriate.
The ASBMB PAAC encourages the NIH to develop policies to address sexual harassment of those working on NIH-funded projects and work with other agencies that support extramural research to ensure uniformity in reporting and consequences.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.
ASBMB weighs in on NIH reform proposal
The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.
ASBMB seeks feedback on NIH postdoc training questions
The National Institutes of Health takes steps toward addressing concerns about support caps, a funding mechanism and professional development.
5 growing threats to academic freedom
From educational gag orders to the decline of tenure-track positions, academic freedom in the United States has been worsening in recent years.
Will Congress revive the China Initiative?
The 2018 program to counter economic espionage raised fears about anti-Asian discrimination and discouraged researchers.
The sweeping impact of the Supreme Court’s Chevron reversal
Repealing the 40-year-old doctrine throws laws on climate, conservation, health, technology and more into doubt.