‘I’d have to build the rails first’
The title of this essay series, “Derailed but Undeterred,” gave me a few problems at first when it came time to write. When I think about a derailed career, it suggests a carefully thought-out plan gone awry. The trouble is, when I think back to those first few years out of grad school, a carefully thought-out plan isn’t one of the things I remember!
I had accepted a postdoc at The Scripps Research Institute and moved from London to La Jolla but without any clear idea of where that would take me in the long term, and once I was there it started to become clear that an academic research job wasn’t that appealing.
Getting involved with Scripps’ postdoc association kindled an existing interest in science policy, but how was a postdoc from the U.K. supposed to make that leap in the U.S.? Perhaps, rather than being derailed, my career was more like a train sitting in a field: In order to get anywhere, I’d have to build the rails first.
For U.S. citizens, science policy fellowships sponsored by scientific societies such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science or the American Society of Human Genetics offered the clearest path from the lab to Washington, D.C. These weren’t really an option if, like me, you were a foreigner.
Armed with useful advice from people like Peter Fiske, who specializes in helping Ph.D.s realize their career options, I understood that over the next few years I needed to gain the same sort of experience on my own. Now at the University of Kentucky, I was fortunate to work for a supportive principal investigator. In the same way that other postdocs worked on independent research that would open the door to faculty appointments, I set about building the resume I’d need to open doors into policy.
Writing for the technology publication Ars Technica taught me how to write about science for different audiences. Teaching science policy at the Patterson School on campus was invaluable for thinking about how to communicate science and science policy. Working with the National Postdoctoral Association, including a two-year stint on the board of directors, gave me actual policy experience and developed bureaucratic and organizational skills that I couldn’t get from the bench.
A little luck and a good professional network later, I found myself starting work in 2009 as a policy analyst at the National Human Genome Research Institute, one of the National Institutes of Health’s 27 institutes and centers and the organization behind the Human Genome Project. The past few years have involved working with some very smart and dedicated people in a very exciting area spanning the worlds of research and medicine. I may not have been able to predict this trajectory a decade ago, but it’s been a great journey.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Can AI help people trust scientists?
Scientists use jargon and complicated language to describe their work. Regular folks ‘get it’ more when descriptions are simpler – and think better of the researchers themselves.
The Art of Science Communication as an infographic
Sometimes a picture is worth a lot of words.
Guiding my sister through cancer
A scientist learns that sometimes communicating all the data and research needs to take a backseat.
Our top 10 articles of 2024
ASBMB Today posted more than 400 original articles this year. The ones that were most read covered research, society news, policy, mental health, careers and more.
From curiosity to conversation: My first science café
“Why was I so nervous? I’d spoken in hundreds of seminars and classes, in front of large audiences.” But this was the first time Ed Eisenstein was explaining his research “to a crowd of nonscientists relaxing over food and drink at a local tavern.”
‘One word or less’
For a long time, Howard Steinman thought this phrase was a joke: “Less than one word is no words, and you can't answer a question without words.”